Main Content

Attorney Ad Litem versus Amicus Attorney

Posted on by Stephanie Hoppas
a picture of a child eating a bowl of chocolate bar pieces for breakfast with a spoon

Attorney Ad Litem versus Amicus Attorney

Both an attorney ad litem and an amicus attorney are court appointed attorneys who represent children during a custody dispute.

Why does the Court appoint a representative for a child in a custody dispute?

The Court has the power to appoint an attorney ad litem or an amicus attorney in a case where both parents ask for custody.

Then we all ask – what is the difference?

Legal answer: The attorney ad litem represents the child, and the child’s expressed objectives. In contrast, the amicus attorney represents the best interest of the child.

Simple answer: The attorney ad litem informs the court that the child wants chocolate for breakfast. However, the amicus attorney, knowing the child wants chocolate for breakfast, advocates all the reasons for or against that want.

Next discussion to address the changes to the role as an Amicus Attorney, effective September 1, 2025.

Subscribe to our newsletter to be informed when we post more content like this.

About Stephanie Hoppas

Stephanie brings a fresh approach to family law by focusing on the family first. As parents, we work hard to raise young and successful adults. Our actions (and sometimes inactions) and words have meaning in their everyday lives. Even if the marital relationship changes, a child’s relationship with each of their parents needs to remain a constant. The way parents interact with each other, or in front of their children, have on-going and lasting effects. With legal guidance focused on the best interests of the children, both parents can continue to cultivate the child’s growth and development. View all posts by Stephanie Hoppas →

Comments are closed.